Friday, November 4, 2016

Gravitating Towards Gunnar

Books are very unpredictable, sometimes they are just awful, other times a book just clicks, and you can’t put it down. For me, The White Boy Shuffle clicked in an instant. I’m not trying to be cliché, but Beatty’s use of humor and Gunnar’s sarcastic joking character really made the book come alive. For me most fictional books and characters seemed so distant. Good authors, like Wright for example, are able to create situations where I can feel emotion or create situations that I can relate to, but Beatty does this and more. Beatty goes the basic empathetic style, and creates a character that we really want to be around, someone that we want to get to know better.

People in this class describe him as the “funny, cool black guy” (28). Characters in the novel gravitate towards Gunnar and I seemed to be drawn to him as well. Within the first few pages, I already knew I loved Gunnar. Gunnar’s book “Watermelanin” had me laughing from the first page. While the title in and of itself is funny, it has also “sold 126 million copies”. Beatty surrounds Gunnar with an incredible aura of satire that makes every scene seem like an occurrence that we see every day. We know that a book of poetry would never actually sell 126 million copies, but because the way he presents it is so nonchalant and direct we end up wanting to believe him.

I also feel Gunnar’s character is very tailored to our generation and age range. Gunnar uses “swear words” to the point that they seem normal. In high school I feel this same way, I hear the language so often that it feels normal to hear it every day. Gunnar even uses the language in a way that I hear all the time. His purpose for using foul language isn’t exclusively to insult or belittle others. Most of the time it is for comedic value. Like when he writes his letter to David Schoenfeld he ends the letter with “Shalom, motherf***er” (40). This is exactly the type of language I see every day in high school.


Also the fact that Gunnar uses such language at such a young age makes it seem even more satirical. Gunnar seems to be so mature, and instead of using his maturity as a way to put himself above everyone, he uses it to make everyone like him. Gunnar, despite his very nonchalant carefree attitude, is very intelligent which furthers my respect and attachment to him. In the third grade Ms. Cegeny asked Gunnar “what was the last thing Melissa read” (29), and even though Gunnar was daydreaming and talking to Cecilia he was able to summarize the passage Melissa read. All of Gunnar’s qualities make him a very entertaining character that keeps me turning. While I am curious to see where the plot takes us, I am more interested in the humor and witty comments that Gunnar is sure to keep bringing to the table. 

3 comments:

  1. It certainly is a massive change from the previous protagonists we have focused on. There, we had to make assumptions and guesses to try to gain an insight on the characters because we had a rather limited amount of information to base upon our understanding of them. Obviously, as we read more African-American Literature, it has become easier to follow some trends and to differentiate between themes and moral, but the joy of reading Gunnar definitely makes this book a different read. Particularly, anyone our age can form a personal connection and deeper ideas about his characters, and consequently the book and Beatty's motives.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree that compared to the other books we've read this is pretty youth oriented. That said, I must admit to being a little skeptical to Gunnar as a narrator/character. In the prologue we see a person who seems very radical, grown, up and kinda crazy. I think because of this I'm almost waiting for the moment when Gunnar starts to think more radically, and I feel like his current way of asking is only momentary which makes me question him as a narrator.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I also like Beatty's writing style. What drew me in was the realness of his writing. The dialogues seem very believable, whereas in the other books we have read, the dialogues sometimes tried to force certain points. The dialogues seemed like real glimpses into the character's lives instead of a constructed script. Beatty is very upfront about what he thinks, sometimes brutally honest. I like your point about the explicit language. Beatty uses the language well to both emphasize certain points and make the dialogues realistic.

    ReplyDelete